Harris v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of carjacking, in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl-Vol., 1997 Supp.), Article 27 § 348A.1 The issue we must decide in this case is whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that carjacking is not a specific intent crime. We conclude that carjacking is not a specific intent crime, and accordingly, we shall affirm the trial court.
*600I
We shall briefly state the facts. On November 26, 1996, Timothy Harris, Jack Tipton and several other Mends were playing cards and drinking alcohol at a Mend’s house. Tipton offered to drive…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Medex v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Gillespie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.