Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 20, 1999No. 81, September Term, 1998PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of carjacking, in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl-Vol., 1997 Supp.), Article 27 § 348A.1 The issue we must decide in this case is whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that carjacking is not a specific intent crime. We conclude that carjacking is not a specific intent crime, and accordingly, we shall affirm the trial court.

*600I

We shall briefly state the facts. On November 26, 1996, Timothy Harris, Jack Tipton and several other Mends were playing cards and drinking alcohol at a Mend’s house. Tipton offered to drive…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Medex v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Gillespie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API