Legal Opinion

United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel Jones

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1995No. 93-10770, 93-10775 and 93-10779PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Donovan Dwayne Oliver, Darryl Lee McMillan, and Nathaniel Jones appeal their convictions and sentences for carjacking/aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2119, and using a firearm during a crime of violenee/aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 924(c). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.

I

Background

The evidence at trial disclosed the following facts: On December 7, 1992, Oliver, Jones and McMillan drove to a liquor store in Bakersfield, California. In…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. MarekCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. LaraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Sustache-Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API