Legal Opinion

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Evans

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1893No. 301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Htales for the Northern District of Iowa.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, District Judge.

From the record before us, it appears that in the month of August, 1891, the defendant in error engaged transportation for himself and two valuable trotting horses over the railroad of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company from Dubuque, Iowa, to Winona, Minn. While in transit the car in which the plain Lift' and his horses were riding collided with another car and an engine of the railway company, in consequence of which the plaintiff and his horses sustained injuries. For the injuries so sustained the defendant in error brought an action against the railway…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Crabtree v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Pikes Peak Power Co. v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Hastings v. AmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
  5. Merritt v. American Steel-Barge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API