Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1893No. 73PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. At Law. Action of trespass to try title, brought by J. P. Hamilton and others against J. G-. Brown and numerous other parties, to recover a league of land in Payette county, Tex.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. At Law. Action of trespass to try title, brought by J. P. Hamilton and others against J. G-. Brown and numerous other parties, to recover a league of land in Payette county, Tex. To a plea of estoppel filed by defendants, a general demurrer and two special exceptions were overruled by the circuit court; and, plaintiffs having elected to stand on their demurrer and exceptions, judgment was thereupon entered for defendants. Plaintiffs bring error. Statement by PAJRDEE, Circuit Judge: This action was instituted…

1Opinion of the Court

PARDEE, Circuit Judge,

(after stating the facts.) The judgment in this case, brought here for review, was rendered and entered on the 18th day of July, 1893, and was in favor of the defendants, adjudging that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit, and the defendants go hence without day, and recover their costs. In the judgment neither plaintiffs nor defendants were specifically named. On the iOfch day of February, 1892, at a subsequent term of the court, on motion of plaintiffs’ attorneys, and on notice to defendants’ attorneys, the said judgment was amended so far, and only so far, as to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hastings v. AmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. City of Indianapolis v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
  4. Howard Ins. Co. of New York v. SilverbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Wright v. MacFarlane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API