Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. Marquart
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1975No. 11758PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
This action arose out of a dispute between the sole stockholders of a small corporation. The case was tried to the court, and judgment for $7,500 was rendered against the appellant Atkinson. This appeal followed. This Court assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
Appellant Atkinson formed a partnership with appellee Marquart entitled A & M Rifle Co. in 1953. The partnership engaged in the business of custom rifle manufacture and repair.
In 1964 the partners formed a corporation entitled A & M Rifle Co., Inc. which took over the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Steinfeld v. NielsenArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Acheson v. ShafterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- O'HERN v. BowlingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- M-R Sullivan Manufacturing Co. v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Mattison v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.