Frangiosa v. Kapoukranidis
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment of the Caledonia Superior Court, which held that a check tendered by defendant bearing the statement “Paid in Full” constituted an accord and satisfaction upon its being cashed by plaintiff. Because plaintiff clearly reserved his rights when he endorsed the check, we reverse.
Plaintiff provided electrical services to defendant at his restaurant business in Lancaster, New Hampshire. He began work before he offered an estimate of its total cost. After one day at the job, plaintiff estimated that the project would cost from $3,000 to $4,000, exclusive of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Horn Waterproofing Corp. v. Bushwick Iron & Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Scholl v. TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Flambeau Products Corp. v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Air Van Lines, Inc. v. BusterAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alpine Haven Property Owners Ass'n v. DeptulaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Kpc Corporation v. the Book Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Roy v. MugfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Tooley v. Robinson Springs Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Margason v. RobertsColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.