Legal Opinion

Roy v. Mugford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 8, 1994No. 92-617PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Plaintiffs Denis and Helen Roy appeal from a decision of the Washington Superior Court denying them attorney’s fees on their successful action to recover $20,000 due on a 1987 promissory note. Defendants are Wayne and Waldo Mug-ford; Peerless Granite Company, a business the Mugfords purchased from plaintiffs by stock sale; and M & W Polishing Company, another business owned by the Mugfords. Defendants cross-appeal the court’s decision to allow recovery of the $20,000. We affirm the court’s award of the $20,000 plus interest, but reverse and remand for determination and award of attorney’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Abington Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Singleton v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carter v. GugliuzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. IrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Upper Valley Regional Landfill Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. New England Partnership, Inc. v. Rutland City School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Doe v. Vermont Office of Health AccessSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API