Legal Opinion
Air Van Lines, Inc. v. Buster
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1983No. 6563PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
FACTS
Air Van Lines, Inc. [AVL] sued Keystone Complex [Keystone], a partnership, for a balance allegedly due on a contract whereby AVL agreed to perform services and Keystone agreed to pay for the services. Keystone answered raising “accord and satisfaction” as a defense, and moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Keystone’s motion and dismissed the case. AVL appeals. We affirm.
AVL, an Anchorage firm, performed a moving job in Valdez under an agreement with Keystone, a partnership of Jack Buster and Bill Lawrence. Under the original agreement between…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Jahn v. BurnsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Department of Fisheries v. J-Z Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Chancellor, Inc. v. Hamilton Appliance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Brown v. Coastal Truckways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Horn Waterproofing Corp. v. Bushwick Iron & Steel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Allen v. R.G. Industrial SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.