In Re Hahn
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for reinstatement to practice law. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner herein on the twenty-sixth day of July, 1915, was, after examination duly made, admitted to practice law in all the courts of the state. In November, 1917, the Bar Association of Los Angeles County filed in the superior court an accusation wherein there was set forth a description of certain acts done by this petitioner while practicing his profession. The accusation contained three counts. The first set forth language used by petitioner in the argument of a criminal case in the superior court, which language was offensive and vituperative in character and wholly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Danford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Friday v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.