Legal Opinion

Danford v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1920No. Civ. No. 3560PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court from entertaining proceedings instituted. against petitioner charging him with contempt of court. The affidavit upon which the contempt proceedings are based alleges that on March 1, 1909, petitioner, who theretofore had been an attorney licensed to practice law, was disbarred from practice in all courts of the state by an order of the superior court in Los Angeles County in accord with proceedings duly instituted for that purpose. About three and a half years thereafter the judge who had made the order of disbarment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of DanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. In Re Disbarment of WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API