Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Ramage

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1916No. 12788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Blake, J., entered October 7, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action upon a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Boyd Hamilton, commenced this action in the superior court for Spokane county, to recover upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant James S. Ramage to Orofino Portland Cement Company, which note was thereafter, before maturity, assigned by that company to the plaintiff as collateral security for a loan. One of the defenses made against the note was failure of consideration, which it is alleged was known to the plaintiff at the time he acquired the note from the company. The other defense need not be here noticed. Trial before the court without a jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gross v. BenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bay View Brewing Co. v. TecklenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MihillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Reiter v. PollardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API