Legal Opinion

Hildreth v. Duff

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 1906No. 15PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On bill and cross-bill and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

The original bill was brought by Herbert E. Hildreth against Robert P. Duff and Edward A. Kitzmiller, copartners doing business as P. Duff & Sons, to compel them to assign to the complainant letters patent No. 736,313, for a method of pulling candy, granted on August 11, 1903, to Chas. Thibodeau, as assignor to Catherine M. Thibodeau, and by her assigned to the defendants, and also the defendants’ interest under an assignment to them by Chas. Thibodeau in an application filed by the latter for letters patent for a candy pulling machine, and to enjoin the defendants from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Noonan v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Sun Insurance v. Greenville Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Monsanto Chemical Works v. JaegerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Beidler v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Hildreth v. DuffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API