Legal Opinion
Monsanto Chemical Works v. Jaeger
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 23, 1929No. 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, District Judge.
This is a bill in equity praying for specific performance of two written contracts, one relating to sulphuric aad and tbe other relating to phthalie anhydride.
The plaintiff owns and operates two- manufacturing plants, one at East St. Louis, 111., and the other at St. Louis, Mo. At tbe former plant, one of its' products of manufacture is sulphuric acid and at tbe latter phthalie anhydride.
Tbe defendants axe experienced chemists, and axe tbe inventors and discoverers of certain new processes and eontaet masses for the manufacture of sulphuric acid and phthalie anhydride.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hennessy v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Koehring Company v. National Automatic Tool Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1966
- Reddi-Wip, Inc. v. Lemay Valve CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- New Britain Machine Co. v. YeoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.