Beidler v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, P. J.
These cases, involving the same subject-matter, were, by agreement, heard and considered together by the court.
The action below, filed by plaintiff Beidler, an assignee of coplaintiff John H. Gardner’s rights under a patent assignment from defendant (Davis) to Gardner, sought to have specifically enforced that latter contract of assignment.
Before this court, the matter appears as two appeals by the defendant on questions of law and fact. The same relief is here sought as was sought in the Court of Common Pleas.
The assignment in question, identified as “exhibit A” attached to plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hennessy v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Southern Lead Corp. v. GlassSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hildreth v. DuffU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1906
- Levy v. DattlebaumU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ridge Corporation v. Altum LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023