Legal Opinion

Princeton Power Co. v. Calloway

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1925No. 5347PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

By three separate bills, and upon the same grounds, the plaintiff sought the same injunctive relief against defendants, Calloway, Surber and Sweeney, respectively restraining and inhibiting them and each of them from operating taxi-cabs over the public road between Princeton and Blue-field, in Mercer County, paralleling the plaintiff’s .traction line between the same points, and to its irreparable injury, and without having obtained from the State Road Commission the certificate of convenience required by the state road law and the rules and regulations lawfully prescribed by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West Suburban Transportation Co. v. Chicago & West Towns Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bryant v. LoganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Davis & Banker, Inc. v. NickellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Seattle & Rainier Valley Railway Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Campbell, Mo. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Cirese v. RidgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Jarrell v. Orlando Transit Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co. v. State Road CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Reynolds Taxi Co. v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API