Legal Opinion

Banning v. Marsh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1932No. 28518PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This suit was brought to enjoin the secretary of state from placing on the ballot a referendum on chapter 107, Laws 1931. The validity of the signatures to the referendum petition was questioned. The appellant intervened as a taxpayer and alleged that the law was unconstitutional for that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the federal Constitution and section 3, art. I of the Nebraska Constitution. The trial court entered a decree finding that the referendum petition did not contain a sufficient number of valid signatures, distributed as required by law, to subject the legislative…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. New York Life Insurance v. BurbankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Garden City News v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Lane v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lynn v. Kearney CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Smrha v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fugate Ex Rel. McArthur v. RoninNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Schroder v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API