Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Burbank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1927No. 38082PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

As a preliminary statement in general terms of the question submitted, it may be said to be: Should the term "gross amount of premiums received by it * * * for business done in this state,” in Section 1333, Code Supplement, 1913, requiring insurance companies of plaintiff’s class to pay a tax of 2|4 per cent thereon, be construed to mean the total amount of premiums computed at table or policy rates at their face, or should it be construed to mean that amount less such sums as the company has during the year abated from premiums or paid in cash to policyholders for dividends and surrender…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Yu Cong Eng v. TrinidadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  2. Eysink v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Kruck v. NeedlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. New England Mut. Life Ins. v. ReeceTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API