Legal Opinion

A. B. Dick Co. v. Duplicating Machine & Supply Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 16, 1934No. 474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated suits were for infringement of patent No. 1,526,982 for a stencil sheet. Claim 16 only is relied upon and reads:

“16. A stencil-sheet adapted for conver-, sion into a stencil by the impact of type and the like thereon, the same comprising an open, porous base having a coating including a soluble compound of cellulose, and a tempering means which forms with said compound a solid, homogeneous body which is type-impressible throughout an extended period of time.”

The patent has been held valid by this court. A. B. Dick Co. v. Shallcross Co., Inc., 42 F.(2d)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. AB Dick Co. v. Simplicator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Wickelman v. A. B. Dick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  5. Outlook Envelope Co. v. General Paper Goods Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API