Legal Opinion
A. B. Dick Co. v. Barnett
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 5, 1923No. 165PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is not necessary to quote the claims in suit; the substance of the matter *800is the second claim, which is set forth at length in 246 Fed. at page 311. The essential characteristics of the product which is the subject of patent are found in a sheet of fibrous material which shall be (1) dry, but hygroscopic; and (2) impregnated with a coagulated colloidal substance and a tempering agent.
The history of this not unimportant art, the position of the patented product therein, and the means by which the product is reached are matters sufficiently set forth in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogg v. EmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Matheson v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- H. Ward Leonard, Inc. v. Maxwell Motor Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Tannage Patent Co. v. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
- Rynear Co. v. EvansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- American Stainless Steel Co. v. Ludlum Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. US Laminating Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.