Hall v. O'Neil Turpentine Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by the Court En Banc. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court. . . !
1Opinion of the CourtHocker, J.
The plaintiffs, T. C. Hall and W. R. Bigbam, sued the defendant, the O’Neil Turpentine Company, in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County. A. final judgment was entered in favor of the defendants on a demurrer to the declaration and the plaintiffs are here on writ of error. In February, 1908, the plaintiffs fiied their declaration. It is as follows: “That heretofore to-wit on the 3rd day of January, A. D. 1907, the County of Hillsborough by and through its Board of County Commissioners made and entered into a certain contract in writing with the plaintiffs whereby the plaintiffs were given…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- State ex rel. Arkansas Industrial Co. v. NeelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Holland v. State ex rel. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Horner v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richardson v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. OlveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Reliance Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Prison CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Troup v. MeyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Gables Ins. Recovery, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.