Legal Opinion

Horner v. . Wood

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] None of the exceptions which the defendants take to the complaint appear to me to be well founded.

1. It is argued that the contract, the assignment of which is the consideration of the defendants' covenant, is void on its face for want of conformity to certain express provisions of the statute respecting the letting of such contracts. The contract, as referred to in a general way in the agreement between the present parties, is said to be for the services of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad v. Atlantic & North Carolina Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Hall v. O'Neil Turpentine Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Hayes v. WillioNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API