Legal Opinion

Wood v. Henley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 41,321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

This is an action in assumpsit on certain promissory notes executed by defendant to the Presque Isle County Savings Bank, which notes were subsequently indorsed by the bank to the trustees of the segregated assets of the bank.

February 1, 1939, plaintiffs filed their declaration and claimed recovery on a note dated October 20, 1934, in the sum of $3,550, and one dated October 13, 1934, in the sum of $3,650. Defendant filed his answer and admitted the execution and nonpayment of the notes. Defendant also filed a claim for set-off and recoupment in the amount of approximately $5,000 for services…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Thompson v. DouglassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Kingdom of Norway v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  5. Marsh v. BurnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citizens Commercial & Savings Bank v. EngbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Kita v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Kwaiser v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Clemmons v. Super Food Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API