Legal Opinion

Kwaiser v. Peters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1968No. Calendar No 13, Docket 51,743PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

(for reversal and remand). We granted leave to appeal for the limited purpose of determining whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for new trial based upon allegations that a juror improperly associated with defendant and his counsel immediately after verdict favorable to defendant and that the same juror falsely answered his personal history questionnaire required by GCR 1963, 510. 379 Mich 765. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. 6 Mich App 153.

At an evidentiary hearing on plaintiff’s motion for new trial, witnesses testified that within about an hour after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. SchramMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. PizzinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bunda v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. NickMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. KangasMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shirley v. Drackett Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People v. DaoustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HeimMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Illenden v. IllendenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Vanden Bosch v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API