Ryer v. Rio Land & Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION to prove exceptions to be inserted in a settled statement on motion for new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an application to this court, made by the defendant, to be allowed to prove certain exceptions and have them incorporated in a bill of exceptions. The motion is presented here under the following state of facts: The cause was pending in the superior court of Solano County and judgment awarded to defendant. Plaintiff gave notice of intention to move for a new trial, and in due time a proposed statement to be used on such motion, and amendments thereto, were presented to the judge for settlement, who, on the 20th of July, 1904, settled the same and directed the statement as settled to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Houghton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curtin v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Dernham v. BagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Doyle v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Wadsworth v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934