Merced Bank v. Price
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for an order permitting appellants to file, as a part of the transcript and record on appeal, certain specifications which were not included in the engrossed bill of exceptions as certified by the trial judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. G. G. Goucher, W. H. Larew, and J. S. Larew, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a motion for an order permitting appellants to file, as a part of the transcript and record on appeal herein, certain specifications of the particulars in which it is claimed that the findings of the trial court are not sustained by the evidence, and certain specifications of errors of law, which were not included in the engrossed bill of exceptions as certified by the trial judge. It is made to appear by an order of the trial judge, based on the motion of appellants, that such specifications were in fact allowed.and settled by the judge as a part of the bill of exceptions,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Baker v. BorelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Fountain Water Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ryer v. Rio Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. Helena Light & Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- McMahon v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- McCarty v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Estate of ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Jackson v. DolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.