Legal Opinion
Dell Products LP v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 29, 2011No. 2010-1451PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to interpret the phrase “goods put up in sets for retail sale” as used in General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Court of International Trade upheld a ruling of U.S. Customs and Border Protection that spare laptop batteries that were offered for sale individually but were packaged with laptop computers for shipment were not “put up in sets for retail sale” with those computers. We affirm.
I
Dell Products LP manufactures and sells secondary batteries for use with laptop computers. A secondary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Sigma-Tau Healthscience, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.