Legal Opinion

Keller v. Feasterville Family Health Care Center

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 2008No. Civil Action 07-CV-2309PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIMOTHY R. RICE, United States Magistrate Judge.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2008, upon consideration of the following motions and responses, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs motion in limine to preclude portions of Dr. Barry Rovner’s testimony (Document No. 33) is DENIED.

2. Plaintiffs motion in limine to preclude portions of Dr. David E. Epstein’s testimony (Document No. 34) is DENIED.

3. Plaintiffs motion in limine to preclude portions of Dr. Arthur McTighe’s testimony (Document No. 36) is GRANTED, in part.

4.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daddio v. A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children of the Nemours FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Ford v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  3. Dutton v. RandoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. Terry v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Boncher v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API