Legal Opinion

Luhrs v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1928No. Civil No. 2710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

— In this action Arthur Luhrs, a taxpayer of Phoenix, Arizona, seeks to enjoin that city and certain of its officers' from executing, issuing, selling and delivering any of the “street railway reconstruction and improvement bonds” that a majority of its voters authorized at an election held on April 30th, 1927.

The gravamen of the complaint is that Ordinance No. 928 of that city, under which the question whether the city should issue its bonds for the purpose of raising funds to reconstruct and rehabilitate its municipally owned and operated street-car system was submitted to the voters is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Fairchild v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Buntman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fischer v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hillsborough County v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sunshine Food Stores v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Martin v. WhitingArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Cunningham v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Funk v. Town of Strathmoor VillageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API