Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 15, 1941No. 30202PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, C. J.
February 20, 1940, an election was held in Oklahoma City for the purpose of deciding whether said city should issue $6,911,000 negotiable coupon bonds for the purpose of providing funds for proposed water supply improvements. Admittedly the election was held in pursuance of the authority of art. 10, secs. 26 and 27, Constitution of Oklahoma, Okla. St. Ann., and is whol ly governed by said constitutional provisions, as aided and construed by applicable laws of the State Legislature and decisions of this court.
The ballots cast at this election were counted, certified, canvassed, and the result…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Millán Soto v. Caribe Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Braine v. City of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Covington v. AnthonySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Millán Soto v. Caribe Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961