Legal Opinion
Kenman Engineering v. City of Union
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2002No. 01-6145PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM.
I. Background
Plaintiffs-appellants in this action are: (1) Kenmen Engineering, a partnership composed of Kenneth Miles and Ken Menz; (2) Miles Specialty Company (d/b/a El Reno Terminal Grain), a corporation in which Mr. Miles is the principal; and (3) Mr. Miles and Mr. Menz in their individual capacities. Defendant-appellee is the City of Union City, Oklahoma, and various Union City officers…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Bianchi v. RylaarsdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bolden v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc. v. NudellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.