Legal Opinion
Bolden v. City of Topeka
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2006No. 04-3306PublishedCited by 321 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
James Bolden is not happy with the City of Topeka, Kansas, and several of its officials. The City demolished as nuisances two buildings he purchased at tax sales and then refused to extend his janitorial contract. After losing his attempt in state court to enjoin demolition of his buildings, he sought an injunction in federal court and eventually amended his federal complaint to include claims against the City and several individuals arising out of the demolitions and the termination of his janitorial contract. He alleged discrimination based on race (he is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by321 opinions
- Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Duplan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Arendale v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.