Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Roquemore
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Potter County Court; T. W. McBride, Judge. ■Suit by O. G. Roquemore against the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Appellee, Roquemore, sued appellant, Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, to recover the value of certain services rendered by bim as an architect, under an alleged contract, whereby he was employed to prepare certain* plans for a proposed building. A trial resulted in a judgment for appellee in the. sum of $884.91.
Appellee, plaintiff below, alleged that appellant was a corporation existing under the laws of Illinois with an office or place of business in Amarillo, Tex.; that he was en-i gaged in the profession of an architect in ' said last-named place; that appellant was conducting a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- P. J. Willis & Brother v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Henry & DilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- La Grone v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Garrett v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hines v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Osage Oil & Gas Co. v. CaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Greene v. Waggoner Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Dove v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Hines v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.