Garrett v. Dodson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Hardeman County; J'. A..Nabers, Judge. Action by S. H. Crossley and others, as trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church South at 'Chillicothe, Texas, as successors of O. H. Dodson and others, former trustees, against A. M. Garrett and others, wherein the Decatur Cornice & Roofing Company of Decatur, Alabama, intervened. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.
This action was prosecuted upon an amended petition by S. H. Crossley, E. M. Haynes, R. E. Wafer, J. P. McPherson, D. M. Norwood, John B. Mulky, and A. S. Curry, as trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church South at Chillicothe, Tex., who alleged that they are the successors of O. H. Dodson et al., who were former trustees of the church and who entered into a certain building contract for the erection of a church in the town of Chillicothe, for that denomination, with one A. M. Garrett, as contractor. The building was to be erected for the sum of $12,477.77, according to certain plans and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
- Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Collier v. BettertonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Jones & Carey v. RisleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Indianola v. Gulf, Western Texas & Pacific RailwayTexas Supreme Court · 1882
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. LincecumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Goodrum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Hogberg v. LandfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.