Legal Opinion

Hines v. Parry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1920No. 1722Published

1Opinion

On' Motion for Rehearing.

In an extended motion for rehearing plaintiff in error so earnestly and vigorously attacks the original opinion that we feel the necessity of again considering the propositions advanced.

It is first contended that this court erred in holding that the trial court correctly refused to give defendant’s special charge No. 1. This charge is set out in the original opinion. As appears from the language of the special charge, it was not requested for the purpose of correcting or in lieu of the charge already given by the court on negligence. Subdivision (b) of the general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dallas Consol. Electric Street Ry. Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. RoquemoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API