Legal Opinion

Hines v. Parry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1920No. 1722PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant in error, Parry, filed this suit against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, alleging that he was injured in a wreck on the line of the St. Louis, San Francisco Texas Railway Company, whereby he sustained damages in the sum of $15,500. The case was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for $2,500.

Plaintiff in error requested the court to charge the jury as follows:

"Gentlemen of the jury, you are instructed that if you find and believe from the evidence that the derailment of the train on which plaintiff claims to have been injured was caused by some…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railroad v. HallorenTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Olds Motor Works v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Dallas Consol. Electric Street Ry. Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Hines v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GreshamTexas Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Estep v. BrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Hatt v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Ft. Worth, & D. C. Ry. Co. v. SmithersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API