Legal Opinion

Smith v. MacAlister

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 29, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

On October 10, 1966, the plaintiff Smith agreed in writing with the defendant MacAlister to purchase a parcel of land owned by MacAlister on Plum Island in the town of Newbury. Before the agreed date for performance, November 21, 1966, a surveyor determined that the porch of a house belonging to Stoddard, an abutting land owner, extended eight feet by twenty-five feet into MacAlister’s parcel. Stoddard asserted to Smith that she had title to the land on which her porch extended. Smith has thereafter taken the position that he is entitled to specific performance with either an abatement from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Jeffries v. JeffriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Ratshesky v. PiscopoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Guleserian v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  5. Chesman v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re StacyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  2. Richards v. SAVEWAY OIL CO. INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  3. Brown v. McClatcheyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  4. Kurker v. Shoestring Properties Ltd. PartnershipMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
  5. Smith v. MacAlisterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API