Legal Opinion

Winternitz v. Winternitz

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 21, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment eliminating a husband’s support obligations. The wife claims that the Probate Court lacked jurisdiction over her person and that the trial judge erred in allowing modification because there had been no material change in the parties’ circumstances. Although we think that the substantive question raised on appeal is susceptible to disposition with brief discussion, we first must pause to elaborate on the wife’s claim that the Probate Court lacked personal jurisdiction over her.

The parties were divorced in 1966. The decree of divorce nisi awarded custody of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Schuler v. SchulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Beit v. PROBATE & FAMILY COURT DEPARTMENTMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. KelleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Morris v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Harris v. HarrisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API