Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 9, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a modification judgment of the Probate and Family Court ordering that the husband’s alimony obligation “shall continue at [its] present rate [$120/week] for the next eight (8) months and then shall be reduced to sixty ($60.00) dollars per week for the next eight (8) months and after this period . . . shall be eliminated.” The wife claims that the husband failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that the parties have experienced a material change in their circumstances, let alone a “more than a material change” standard (Stansel v. Stansel, 385 Mass. 510, 515…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schuler v. SchulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Surabian v. SurabianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Stansel v. StanselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Heistand v. HeistandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Pagar v. PagarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. HuddlestonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  2. Reed v. LutherMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API