Legal Opinion

James S. Jackson Co., Inc. v. Meyer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1984No. 83-104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether a judgment creditor is entitled to intervene, as a matter of right, in a lawsuit between the judgment debtor and the debt- or’s assignee, which suit purports to determine the validity of an assignment executed by the judgment debtor prior to the entry of the judgment against it. This identical issue was before this court in an earlier action involving the same parties and the same assignment of the same instrument. James S. Jackson Company, Inc. v. Horseshoe Creek Limited, Wyo., 650 P.2d 281 (1982). We consider our analysis and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Jet Traders Investment Corp. v. Tekair, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  3. Hawaii-Pacific Venture Capital Corp. v. RothbardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Bacon v. Carey Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rawlins Ex Rel. Rawlins v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hance v. StraatsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Matter of Adoption of GSDWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ColleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mulkey-Yelverton v. BlevinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API