Legal Opinion

Kufta v. Hughson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 23, 1957PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

46 N.J. Super. 222 (1957)

134 A.2d 463

ANDREW J. KUFTA, PLAINTIFF,

v.

CECIL HUGHSON AND VERNA B. HUGHSON, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided August 23, 1957.

Mr. Douglas C. Baker, attorney for plaintiff.

Messrs. Eisenberg & Spicer, attorneys for defendants.

CONFORD, J.A.D.

Defendants move for summary judgment "on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law." The action is by a vendee for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of certain real property, inclusive of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ColsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Cauco v. GalanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  4. Mattia v. Northern Ins. Co. of New YorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Johnson v. HubbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1855

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Conopco, Inc. v. McCreadieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  2. Kopp, Inc. v. United Technologies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Presten v. SailerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Gaines v. Monroe Calculating MacH. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API