Legal Opinion

New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of Harrison

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 13, 1939PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

In our view, there is serious question as to whether the respondent utility designed the “petition” filed by it with the Board of Public Utility Commissioners on April 29th, 1936, as a schedule of increased rates fixed by the utility under the authority conferred by section 17 (h) of chapter 195 of the laws of 1911, as amended by chapter 150 of the laws of 1926 (Pamph. L. 1911, pp. 374, 380; Pamph. L. 1926, pp. 239, 240; R. S. 1937, 48:2-21d), and therefore effective, by the mere act of filing, until suspended, changed, or altered by the board…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Grobart v. Society for Establishing Useful ManufacturesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Anske v. Borough of Palisades ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Mowry v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. International Minerals & Mining Corp. v. Citicorp North America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API