Duffy v. Howell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKincaid, J.
Plaintiffs' first amended complaint is not of the character claimed for it by defendants, whereby they are, in effect, both rescinding and affirming the contract to purchase and sell the used automobile. Facts are sufficiently alleged in the first cause of action showing grounds of rescission for fraud, the election to rescind and notice of rescission accompanied by a return to defendants of everything of value received by plaintiffs, a demand for the return of the amount paid by plaintiffs on the contract and the refusal of defendants to comply.
The second cause of action of such complaint…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowles v. LeventhalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- El Paso Furniture Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woods v. CorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Garcia v. Ebeling Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Heesy v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Heesy v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- McKinnis v. ScandaliatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955