Legal Opinion

Heesy v. Vaughn

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1948No. L. A. 20368Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 Cal.2d 701 (1948)

MARY HEESY, Appellant,

v.

RICHARD E. VAUGHN et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 20368.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 28, 1948.

Cantillon & Glover for Appellant.

Albert G. Bergman for Respondents.

SPENCE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying her claims for relief as correlated with her three purported causes of action against defendants: (1) for possession of an automobile; (2) for damages for breach of contract for the sale of the automobile; and (3) for treble damages and attorneys' fees for the alleged sale at a sum in excess of the O.P.A. ceiling price. Conceding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Rusconi v. California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Wilson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pfalzgraf v. VosoNew York Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API