Heesy v. Vaughn
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
31 Cal.2d 701 (1948)
MARY HEESY, Appellant,
v.
RICHARD E. VAUGHN et al., Respondents.
L. A. No. 20368.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Apr. 28, 1948.
Cantillon & Glover for Appellant.
Albert G. Bergman for Respondents.
SPENCE, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying her claims for relief as correlated with her three purported causes of action against defendants: (1) for possession of an automobile; (2) for damages for breach of contract for the sale of the automobile; and (3) for treble damages and attorneys' fees for the alleged sale at a sum in excess of the O.P.A. ceiling price. Conceding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Rusconi v. California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wilson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Pfalzgraf v. VosoNew York Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.