United States v. One 1970 Pontiac GTO, 2-Door Hardtop
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before DUNIWAY, HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from a judgment forfeiting the appellant’s automobile under 21 U.S.C. § 881. The appeal raises three issues: (1) Was the evidence sufficient to prove that the vehicle was used to facilitate the sale of a controlled substance? (2) Do 21 U.S.C. § 881 and 19 U.S.C. § 1615 unconstitutionally impose upon the claimant the burden of proof after the Government proves probable cause to forfeit? (3) Must the Government prove probable cause by clear and convincing evidence?
The evidence amply proved that this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Jesus Reyes MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. One 56-Foot Motor Yacht Named the Tahuna, and New Approach, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. $250,000 in United States Currency, (Two Cases) Appeal of Amador Rodriguez-Ramos (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.