Legal Opinion
United States v. Santoro
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1989No. Nos. 88-6036, 88-6042PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:
In this 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) civil forfeiture proceeding, Rosemarie Santoro appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment against her claim on the defendant real property. Thomas Santoro, Rosemarie’s husband, and their children, Catherine Marie and Christopher, appeal the same order which struck their claims for lack of standing. Because we find that the defendant real property was used to facilitate illegal drug transactions, we affirm the district court’s order as to Rosemarie Santoro. Likewise, because Thomas Santoro had no interest in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. 4492 South Livonia RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. 141st Street Corp. ex rel. HershCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue, Elgin, Illinois, Appeal of Paul F. Born, Iii, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Real Property Located in El Dorado County at 6380 Little Canyon RoadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.