Borden, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARTH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Both Local 222, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (“Union”) and Borden, Inc. (“Borden”) have petitioned for review of an order entered by the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) on July 31, 1992. The Board has cross-petitioned for enforcement of its order.
I
A
The order promulgated by the Board held that Borden had violated: 1) section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) by unilaterally changing the terms and conditions of employment of employees transferred from Borden’s Meadow Gold facility to its Farmer Jack facility and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tricor Products, Inc., And/or C & J Pattern Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Borden, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- (PS) Grissom v. Modesto Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022