Legal Opinion
Former Employees of Invista v. U.S. Secretary of Labor
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 18, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-60; Court 07-00160PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
In this action, former employees of the Chattanooga, Tennessee plant operated by Invista, S.a.r.l. (“the Workers”) contest the determinations of the U.S. Department of Labor denying their petition for certification of eligibility for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) and alternative trade adjustment assistance (“ATAA”). The determinations at issue include the Labor Department’s original denial of the Workers’ petition, as well as the agency’s denial of the Workers’ request for reconsideration, and the agency’s negative determination on remand. See 72 Fed.Reg. 7907,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Akles v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Local 167, International Molders & Allied Workers' Union ex rel. Group of Aggrieved Workers v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Rosemary Fortin v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Former Employees of Hawkins Oil & Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Former Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Former Employees of Invista, S.a.r.l. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Former Employees of Invista v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009