Akles v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
FARLEY, Associate Judge:
This appeal involves two statutory duties imposed upon the Secretary of Veterans Affairs: the duty to “assist ... a claimant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim” (38 U.S.C. § 3007(a)) and the duty to “distribute full information to eligible veterans ... regarding all benefits and services to which they may be entitled” (38 U.S.C. § 241(2)). The appellant contracted mumps while in service which resulted in the atrophy of the left testicle. His reopened claim for an increase in service-connected benefits to a compensable rating for testicular atrophy was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Murphy v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
3Cited by67 opinions
- Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- William A. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Green v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Tucker v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.