Legal Opinion

People v. McKerney

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1967No. Crim. 2908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

—Defendant was charged by information with the offenses of assault with intent to commit rape, a violation of Penal Code, section 220, and indecent exposure, a violation of Penal Code, section 314, subdivision 1; was found guilty by a jury; and appealed from the conviction, seeking a reversal upon the grounds (1) the court erred in refusing to give a cautionary instruction; and (2) the court did not have jurisdiction to try the indecent exposure offense, a misdemeanor.

Defendant requested but the court refused to give the cautionary instruction customarily given in sex offense cases. (CALJIC…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hankla v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. CordovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. ThieckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Griffith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API