Clark Civil Township v. Brookshire
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Appellee instituted this action to recover the value of services rendered and the amount of money expended by him, as road superintendent, upon the highways in Clark township.
He was elected superintendent of roads at the April election in 1882, under the act of 1881 (E. S. 1881, section 5064, et seq.), and was legislated out of office by the act of 1883. Acts of 1883, p. 62 (p. 73, sec. 35).
Soon after his election he received from the county treasurer $219, road funds, as such superintendent.
In addition to the above facts, it is alleged in the first paragraph of the complaint, in s.ubstance,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Bennett v. MeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Brunker v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. ChampionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Vanosdol, Receiver v. Henderson, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.